The Evolution of Throne Speeches in Three Pictures

March 16, 2010

Survey methodology

Technology gives us gimmicks and toys but it also gives us interesting tools. Where does the Word Cloud — a process that reduces a series of text into a picture based on word frequency — come in?  The images are simply cool. Don’t be fooled though… sometimes cool is also filled with insight.

Consider the following word cloud  produced using the application at wordle.net. It is the top 50 words used in the 2010 “Speech from the Throne” (SFT) with a couple of words removed. The words removed were Canada (and its other derivatives) and government.

Speech from the Throne 2010

The top words are continue, country, support, world. This is not a “Speech from the Throne” that appears to have a strong agenda.  Notably, the CBC on its webpage actually produced a similar looking CBC Wordle. There were approximately 6,000 words in the speech that was supposed to recalibrate the Government’s agenda.

Contrast the 2010 speech with the one from 2009. Here we have a speech that clearly has a strong almost forceful purpose. The speech was short (738 words) and the economy is dominant. Other prominent words also convey a sense of direction — crisis, protect, plan, acting, action.

Speech from the Throne 2009

Two and a half months earlier, the 2008 SFT was less focused and broader (it was also short, 525 words). While the economy and the global crisis were clearly on the horizon for the Government, there was a diffuse set of other issues discussed. In fact, clearly negative words (e.g. instability) were balanced often with positive words (improving).

2008 Speech from the Throne

The Harper government provided two speeches that were broad and somewhat diffuse in their agenda that bookended a forceful economic driven speech. Although a reader of the three speeches would no doubt some to a similiar conclusions, the word cloud lets us offer a graphic representation.

It is inexpensive … wurdle.net lets you create these images for free, and can be an excellent heuristic device. Tone is, of course, missing and context is stripped away. This means that the word cloud approach is really only valuable when one is looking at a set of text that has a clear perspective… even without reading the SFT we can identify what Harper might mean with different words.

It is thus best used when all of the comments are from a single source (e.g. a speech) or from a clear open-ended question “What do you like most about x?” rather than questions that are too general.

The word cloud rests somewhat uncomfortably between qualitative analysis and text analytics, which tend to adopt a more comprehensive approach to quantifying the analysis of text. Is it here to stay or will readers tire of the gimmick as it starts to make its regular appearance in reports, presentations and commentary?

Advertisements
, , , ,

About Richard Jenkins

Market research professional and small business owner

View all posts by Richard Jenkins

Subscribe

Subscribe to our RSS feed and social profiles to receive updates.

One Comment on “The Evolution of Throne Speeches in Three Pictures”

  1. sweenoFus Says:

    Just want to say what a great blog you got here!
    I’ve been around for quite a lot of time, but finally decided to show my appreciation of your work!

    Thumbs up, and keep it going!

    Cheers
    Christian, iwspo.net

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: